Kap survey questionnaire11/7/2023 The Alliance’s Technical Support Team (TST) provides on-demand technical support for nutrition in emergencies both remotely and in-country. The GNC Technical Alliance Partners are made up of the GNC partners and other individuals, organizations, initiatives, and academia at global, regional, and national levels that hold nutrition technical expertise across the humanitarian and development spheres. The Global Nutrition Cluster Technical Alliance (GNC) Technical Alliance or Alliance) is an initiative for the mutual benefit of the nutrition community, and affected populations, to improve the quality of nutrition in emergency preparedness, response, and recovery. Here is a quick, cheap, and simple survey method that will do some of what you need and could be adapted to do all you need that is in current use in Sierra Leone. These are only feasible if surveys are quick, cheap, and simple to do. Mostly we will want to monitor levels to identify needs and measure progress towards goals. If (e.g.) you sample HHs with a child aged 0 - 24 months then you will have the full sample to estimate coverage of IYCF counselling activities but only about half the sample to estimate coverage of a program targeting children aged 12 - 24 months such as deworming. Interventions may or may not be universal. This means that your sample size needs to be twice that (i.e. Coverage is often patchy and cluster sample designs used. This needs an efective sample size of n = 96. Usually you will not need to estimate coverage with precision better than about +/- 10%. This is not so bad as contact coverage is a key thing to know. in the FeFol example you would not claim that your were estimating effective coverage). This is OK as long as you admit to what you do (i.e. shown many FeFol tablets taken over what period). did they take iron / folate (FeFol) in the previous pregnancy) rather then effective coverage (e.g. You will probably only be able to collect contact coverage (e.g. with you when asking about micronutrient tablets to avoid this). It is often sufficient to pick a few easily recognisable interventions and ask about them as it can be difficult for respondents to distinguish between many similar interventions (it is, e.g., common to bring samples of tables &c. there may not be a need to look at all interventions in detail. For example, you may not want to look at fortificant levels in flours. You may want to limit your survey to program activities under your (or your clients) control. (2) Essential Nutrition Actions (ENA) covers a very broad set of program actions. You need to "clear-eyed" about what can and cannot be collected well. The issues you raise can only be addressed by careful design and testing. I think, more than any other survey type, KAP questionnaires need to be tested thoroughly. (1) KAP questionnaires / surveys are often poor instruments with a tendency to reflect back program messages irrespective of behaviours.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |